LAT 24.4°N / LON 54.6°ESurface · 0 m

Active since 2021 · Field-active

Certainty about what is hidden.

Every material underground responds to energy in its own way. That response has always been there, lost in the noise. GHOST measures it from the surface, and AI explains it: what is there, how deep, and how sure we are.

Request a briefing See the field record

Airspace · Surface · DepthScroll

Energy✦Minerals✦Groundwater✦Material-referenced geophysics✦Surface measurements✦Blind depth comparisons✦Energy✦Minerals✦Groundwater✦Material-referenced geophysics✦Surface measurements✦Blind depth comparisons✦Energy✦Minerals✦Groundwater✦Material-referenced geophysics✦Surface measurements✦Blind depth comparisons✦Energy✦Minerals✦Groundwater✦Material-referenced geophysics✦Surface measurements✦Blind depth comparisons✦

/ 00 · The exploration decision

Where should the next well go? Which prospect deserves further work? What evidence justifies the capital? truelevel brings a material-referenced assessment into these decisions, alongside geology, conventional geophysics and drilling. Our aim is to narrow uncertainty early enough to change the exploration plan.

/ 01 · How a survey works

01 · Characterize

Learn the target first.

Before we go to the field, we test a real sample of the target, whether crude oil, groundwater or copper, in the lab. The instrument leaves with a fingerprint to look for.

02 · Measure

Read the ground from top to bottom.

On site, GHOST takes optical, electrical, magnetic and resonance readings in a single pass, from the surface down through depth.

03 · Interpret

Rule out the alternatives.

Our AI checks every reading against the fingerprint, the local geology and the survey layout. It keeps only what the data supports, and says so when the data cannot decide.

04 · Report

Commit before we know.

Reports identify target assessments, depth estimates and uncertainty, with interval boundaries and extent where supported. In blind evaluations, predictions are locked before reference data is disclosed.

0104

/ 02 · Hydrocarbon depth evidence

20/ 21

Scored positive depth calls within 10 m of operator-held references

3wells

One pre-drill study and two producing-well comparisons

67days

Between the first study's prediction lock and wireline acquisition

11/ 12

Response clusters within tolerance when adjacent points are grouped

GHOST PRV units at a producing wellsite in Oman

Oman · 2026 · Two producing wells

Two producing wells. The operator kept its well data to itself. GHOST placed 17 of 18 depth points within 10 m without seeing any of it.

4 / 4Well A depth points

13 / 14Well B depth points

11 mAbsolute error at the one point outside the 10 m tolerance

Across the two wells, 17 of 18 scored positive depth calls met the operator's tolerance. Reference data was withheld from the survey team.

See the field record

/ 03 · How we create value

Find the target. Build the project.

truelevel is an exploration company with its own technology. We use GHOST to find and rank targets, secure rights where the evidence justifies it, and build each project with operators and capital partners. We call these positions discovery units.

01 · Survey

Scan and rank

GHOST screens prospective areas and ranks the targets worth a closer look.

02 · Secure

Secure the rights

We take or partner into exploration rights where the evidence and terms justify it.

03 · Prove

Map it in depth

Detailed assessment, independent verification, a drilling plan and project economics.

04 · Partner

Bring in partners

Operators and capital partners join around a defined asset and work program.

05 · Retain

Keep an interest

We seek a continuing stake in each project under its own agreements.

Current exploration positions

/ 04 · In the field

Desert wellsites, African savanna, Central American rainforest. One instrument and one small crew, wherever the question is.

truelevel crew calibrating GHOST beside a wellhead in the desert — Wellsite deployment · Oman

truelevel founder beside a survey helicopter — Airborne field operations

Field crew aligning the GHOST transmitter on a tripod in the savanna — Survey operations · Tanzania

GHOST unit running inside a survey vehicle — GHOST · vehicle deployment

Drilling rig at a validation well with samples laid out — Validation drilling

Survey crew taking readings across open savanna — Ground survey · East Africa

Close-up of a mineral calibration sample under magnification — Material reference · calibration

/ 05 · The ground we survey

Find what lies below. Leave what grows above.

Exploration usually starts by clearing the land. Conventional seismic cuts straight corridors through forest, then runs heavy vibrator trucks or explosive charges along them. In cold northern forests, those lines can take up to 70 years to grow back. And roughly two in three wildcat wells still find nothing commercial.

Illustration: an intact forest with grazing deer, a GHOST tripod and an orange subsurface target

No clearing Target Wildlife stays

Illustration: seismic cut lines through a forest, vibrator trucks, and a drill rig above a dry hole

Cut line · ~10 m wide Vibrator truck Dry hole

Conventional seismicGHOST

Drag to compare. Illustration, not to scale.

~10m

Typical width of a conventional seismic line through forest

70yrs

Up to this long for a line to regrow in cold boreal forest

2in 3

Wildcat wells that find nothing commercial

0km

Of cut line in a GHOST survey

Sources: Pinzon et al., Ecological Applications, 2021 · Canadian Press field study, northwestern Alberta, 2014 · Westwood Global Energy via Offshore Technology, 2020

/ 06 · The fleet

View the fleet

GHOST PRV GHOST WALKER GHOST NOMAD GHOST ROVER GHOST HALO HOOT VESSEL HOOT DIVE GHOST SENTINEL

/ 07 · Divisions

Research and validation

Energy

Oil and gas mapped before the drill bit turns.

Water

Groundwater targeting and borehole planning, followed by drilling and water testing.

Minerals

Material-referenced target assessment to focus geological follow-up and drilling.

GHOST · Geophysical Harmonized Observation of Spatial Targets

Start with what the target is. End with a result you can hold us to.

GHOST is our survey platform, built on a method called Photo-Electric Resonance Vibrometry (PRV). At every point and every depth, a survey asks one question.

“Is the material we are looking for actually here, at this depth, given everything we measured?”

/ The field question

GHOST PRV units on tripods beside a producing wellhead at dusk — GHOST PRV · field deployment · Oman

/ In the field

Airborne field operations · South Africa

Vehicle deployment · Tanzania

Survey flight · Belize

/ Characterize first

01 · Material

We start in the lab with a physical sample of the target. We record how it behaves under controlled conditions, so we know its signature before we go looking for it.

02 · Measurement

In the field, GHOST reads a single surface point all the way down, accounting for local conditions.

03 · Interpretation

The observations are assessed against the reference, local geology and survey geometry. AI assists the analysis and technical review; designated technical leadership approves issued results.

GHOST PRV prototype on a tripod with its field cases during acquisition — GHOST PRV prototype · surface acquisition

/ What GHOST reports

Whether the target material is present at each point.
Its depth, and where the data allows, the top and base of the zone.
How far it extends sideways, where the data supports it.
Estimates of reservoir or resource properties, where the data supports them.
How confident we are, and what remains uncertain.

/ Three outcomes

Supported

The data points to the target, within its stated uncertainty.

Not detected within scope

The observations do not support the target within the survey's stated sensitivity and scope. This does not establish absence beyond those limits.

Inconclusive

The data cannot tell either way.

We never fold these into a simple yes or no. An inconclusive result is never counted as a correct negative.

/ Try it · Run a survey point

Click the ground to survey a point

Result

Awaiting a survey point

Pick any point on the ground. GHOST reads it through depth, compares the readings with the target’s signature, and returns one of three answers. A target is hidden somewhere below.

0Supported0Inconclusive0Not detected

Illustrative simulation. It does not use field data or demonstrate instrument performance, detection probability or spatial resolution.

/ What GHOST is not

Knowing the target narrows the question. It does not make every matching signal unique.

A supported target assessment does not establish recoverable volume, productivity, ore grade or commercial viability. Those require additional evidence.

Depth accuracy, telling materials apart, and spatial detail are three separate abilities. We test each one on its own.

/ Proprietary by design

Our calibration methods, instrument design and AI models are trade secrets, and we do not publish them. Instead we prove performance the way any measurement should be proven: our predictions are locked first, then compared with reference data held by the operator.

/ Field footprint

Same question. No cut lines.

Conventional seismic clears corridors through forest to answer the question below it. GHOST answers it from the sky, without touching the ground.

No clearing Target Wildlife stays

Cut line · ~10 m wide Vibrator truck Dry hole

Conventional seismicGHOST

Drag to compare. Illustration, not to scale.

Explore the platform roadmap See the field record

/ The fleet

One instrument. Seven platforms.

The reported blind depth record comes from one hand-built GHOST instrument. Our roadmap proposes a production sensor core and platforms for stationary, walking, vehicle, autonomous, airborne and marine acquisition. Each platform must demonstrate performance in its intended operating conditions.

Field prototype

Stationary land

GHOST PRV

The tripod-mounted instrument used in the reported depth comparisons. A production version requires environmental qualification, repeatable manufacturing and defined service support.

Planned

Carried on foot

GHOST Walker

A proposed portable platform for terrain beyond vehicle access, with moving acquisition subject to qualification.

Planned

Vehicle mounted

GHOST Nomad

A proposed vehicle platform for survey grids, with motion and vibration effects evaluated before results are compared with stationary acquisition.

Planned

Autonomous ground

GHOST Rover

A proposed unmanned platform for repeatable grid coverage in remote or restricted-access areas.

Planned

Airborne

GHOST Halo

A proposed purpose-built airborne platform for reconnaissance over large or difficult-to-access areas. Platform qualification is separate from earlier airborne field deployments.

Planned

Surface marine

HOOT Vessel

A proposed vessel-based platform requiring marine integration, environmental qualification and field verification.

Planned

Submersible

HOOT Dive

A proposed pressure-qualified subsea platform requiring dedicated engineering, testing and certification.

Concept

Persistent fixed

GHOST Sentinel

A proposed fixed station for repeated observations at one site. Applications and change-detection performance remain to be established.

Concept models illustrate proposed platforms. They do not represent completed or qualified production units. Hover to rotate.

/ A staged development program

The roadmap sets out a proposed 24-month engineering program, with subsea class certification targeted separately at month 30. Timing depends on funding, sensor-core qualification, platform integration and acceptance testing. Performance must be verified for each acquisition mode.

Program status

Current evidence comes from the GHOST PRV field prototype. The production fleet remains a development program; marine and autonomous capabilities have not been demonstrated. Sentinel is an additional concept outside the seven-platform roadmap.

/ Divisions

Three discovery divisions.

One measurement engine, tuned to each material. Each division answers the one question that decides whether to drill, pump or mine.

Energy

Assess hydrocarbon targets and estimate depth before committing to the next well. Integrate GHOST findings with seismic, geology and reservoir analysis to prioritize follow-up. The current scored record addresses hydrocarbon depth agreement.

Hydrocarbon assessmentDepth estimatesWell prioritization

Water

Assess potential water-bearing formations and prioritize borehole locations. Interpret depth and extent where supported; confirm water chemistry, yield and suitability through drilling, sampling and testing.

Aquifer targetingBorehole sitingPost-drill verification

Minerals

Assess calibrated mineral targets and focus geological follow-up and drilling. Current applications include copper sulfide systems and lithium brines, with other material classes under reference development. Mineral performance requires its own validation.

Copper sulfidesLithium brinesMineral reference development

/ Material references and application status

Hydrocarbon depth comparisons form the current scored evidence record. Mineral and groundwater programs apply the same assessment framework, but the hydrocarbon result does not establish their performance. Each additional target class requires reference characterization and qualification under relevant field conditions.

Hydrocarbon depth evidenceGroundwater programsCopper sulfide programsLithium brine programsAdditional references in development

Discuss reference development and an independently scored pilot for your target material.

Explore research and validation

/ Field evidence

Predictions first. Reference data afterward.

Three hydrocarbon wells across two countries provide the current scored depth record. One study recorded predictions before drilling. Two assessed producing wells while their reference data was withheld from the survey team. Here are the results, the protocol and the limits of what they establish.

20/ 21

Scored positive depth calls within 10 m of reference depths

95.24%

Point-level depth concordance in the scored set

67days

From Well Z prediction lock to wireline acquisition

11/ 12

Response clusters within tolerance after grouping adjacent points

Drilling rig at a validation well — Predicted depth vs reference depth · Scored hydrocarbon calls

Depth points within tolerance · Well Z 3/3 · Well A 4/4 · Well B 13/14

Point-level pass rate · 95% Wilson interval 77.33–99.15% · Adjacent points are not independent

/ The scoring rule

A scored depth call passes when its absolute difference from the operator's reference depth is 10 m or less. The illustration explains that rule; it contains no field data. Scoring applies to the comparable positive calls, rather than every possible interval in a well.

/ How the comparisons were conducted

The operator selected the evaluation locations and retained the reference data. In Well Z, the survey preceded drilling; in Wells A and B, the wells were already producing.

GHOST predictions were recorded and locked before reference disclosure to the survey team.

The predictions were compared with operator-supplied wireline reference depths under the defined 10 m tolerance. Well Z also used petrophysical interpretation completed independently before the GHOST outputs were disclosed.

The case studies report comparable-set rules, point-level results and limitations. Repeat QC readings are excluded; adjacent depth calls are also summarized as response clusters.

/ Evaluations and exploration programs

North America · 2025 · Onshore

Well Z predictions were locked 67 days before wireline acquisition. All three comparable interval tops agreed with the reference at the reported depth resolution. The post-drill interpretation was completed independently before the interpreter later joined truelevel.

Oman · 2026 · Onshore, two wells

Reference-blind comparisons at producing wells. Seventeen of eighteen scored positive depth calls fell within 10 m of the operator's reference. One call differed by 11 m.

Central America · 2025 to 2026

Regional reconnaissance and pre-drill assessment in Belize, including geological and reservoir interpretation for regulatory reporting. Exploration-stage interpretations are separate from the scored well comparisons.

East Africa · 2024 to 2026

Hydrocarbon reconnaissance and mineral exploration activities in Tanzania. These programs are reported by project stage, separately from the scored hydrocarbon depth record.

/ Exploration positions

Project positions at different stages of assessment, licensing and development. Survey interpretations and project interests do not establish a commercial discovery.

DU-01

Belize

La Democracia

Survey: A five-part GHOST surface survey supporting assessment of the exploration area.
Prospects: Scenario-based geological and reservoir assessments of the Z19 and Z20 carbonate targets.
Prepared for: The Belize Geology and Petroleum Department.
Stage: Pre-drill assessment. These interpretations are not a reserves or resource statement.

DU-02

Tanzania

Dodoma · Manyoni · Kiteto

Program: Onshore hydrocarbon reconnaissance, with mineral licensing activities assessed separately.
Holding: Project interests through Tanmine Investment Limited.
Stage: Reconnaissance. No drilling results are reported for these positions.

What the results establish

The pooled result describes depth agreement at 21 scored positive calls across three wells. It does not measure detection coverage, sensitivity or false positive rates. The scored set includes no negative locations or confounder tests. Mineral and groundwater performance cannot be inferred from it.

Several points are adjacent within continuous responses. Grouped into response clusters, the result is 11 of 12 within tolerance. The point-level Wilson interval does not account for that dependence and should not be read as a general performance guarantee. The single point-level failure had an 11 m error, one meter beyond tolerance.

Well Z was a pre-drill study; Wells A and B were reference-blind comparisons at producing wells. Well Z's independent interpreter subsequently joined truelevel. These are company-authored case studies using external reference data; larger studies across additional settings are needed to establish general performance.

/ Investment and projects

An exploration company with its own technology.

truelevel develops GHOST and uses it to find, secure and advance its own exploration positions. Investors can take part in the company as a whole, or in a single project.

/ Two ways to participate

01 · Company level

truelevel

The GHOST technology and its field record, the platform roadmap, the team, and truelevel's interests across every exploration position.

Technology: Instrument design, calibration methods and interpretation models are developed by truelevel and held as trade secrets.
Funding: Founder-funded since 2021.

02 · Project level

A single discovery unit

One exploration position, structured in its own vehicle with its own rights, work program and partners. Terms are set project by project.

Partners: Operators, capital partners and, where relevant, national authorities.
truelevel role: Technology, target assessment and a continuing interest under each project's agreements.

/ Where each position stands

Position01 · Screen02 · Secure03 · Prove04 · Drill05 · Develop

DU-01 · BelizeLa DemocraciaPre-drill assessment

DU-02 · TanzaniaDodoma · Manyoni · KitetoReconnaissance

Stages are truelevel's own business labels, not a reserves or resource classification. No drilling results are reported for these positions.

/ The evidence so far

20 of 21 scored depth calls within 10 m, across three hydrocarbon wells in two countries.

Predictions were locked before the operators' reference data was shared. The Field Evidence page sets out the protocol, the clustered result and the limits of what it establishes.

See the field evidence

/ Next milestones

Add blind wells to the scored hydrocarbon record, in new settings.
Qualify a production sensor core and the first mobile platforms.
Advance DU-01 toward a drilling decision.
Test mineral and groundwater applications under the same blind rules.

Milestones are plans, not commitments. Timing depends on funding and partner decisions.

Investor briefings

The business model, the field record and the data room are shared under NDA with qualified investors.

Request an investor briefing

This page is for information only. It is not an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any security or interest.

/ Research and development

Extend the evidence. Qualify the applications.

Our next work expands the hydrocarbon record and tests additional materials, settings and acquisition modes. Each program needs its own reference, endpoints and independent ground truth. Performance claims follow the evidence generated by that program.

/ On the bench

Every unit is built, wired and tuned by hand before it reaches the field.

Instrument development focuses on sensor integration, calibration stability, environmental resilience and repeatable manufacture. Bench testing and field verification provide the evidence required to move from a prototype toward qualified production hardware.

GHOST PRV unit open on the bench during integration — GHOST PRV · hardware integration and bench testing

R/01 · Applied development program

Defense and security

The same measurement that finds oil can watch the ground around a sensitive site. We are developing GHOST for perimeter and subsurface security at airports, seaports, borders and critical infrastructure: tunnels and voids, buried objects, and any change beneath the surface since the last pass.

Detection rates, location accuracy and false alarm rates must be established under site-specific test conditions before operational claims are made.

Airports and airfieldsSeaports and terminalsBorders and crossingsEnergy and utilitiesGovernment and military sites

/ Where it applies

Protect the ground around what matters.

Concept illustration · airport perimeter. GHOST stations on the fence and an airborne unit watch the zones around the site. Detection ranges and rates are under evaluation.

S/01

Airports and airfields

Perimeter fence lines, runways, taxiways and fuel farms. Tunnels or buried objects beneath the fence, and voids under pavement before they fail.

S/02

Seaports and terminals

Quay walls, container yards, gates and pier foundations. Voids and scour behind quay walls, and buried or concealed items in yard areas.

S/03

Borders and crossings

Cross-border tunnels and buried caches along long, remote lines, surveyed by vehicle or from the air instead of fixed sensor grids.

S/04

Energy and utilities

Power plants, substations, refineries, pipelines and water plants. Excavation, tampering or leaks along buried lines, and ground change near critical assets.

S/05

Government and military sites

Embassies, bases and secure facilities. A baseline survey at handover, then repeat passes to flag new excavation, tunneling or buried items.

S/06

Data centers and campuses

Large fenced sites with buried power and fiber. Unrecorded voids, buried hazards and change along the perimeter.

Targets under study

Tunnels and voidsBuried objects and cachesNew excavationUnexploded ordnanceTampering on buried linesLeaks beneath the surface

/ How a perimeter program works

Baseline once. Watch for change.

01 · Baseline

Survey the full perimeter and inner zones once, to record what is normal beneath the ground.

02 · Monitor

Repeat passes at the same points, from a fixed station, a patrol vehicle or the air, on a schedule set by the site.

03 · Flag

The AI compares each pass with the baseline and flags only the changes the data supports, with location and confidence.

04 · Verify

A named analyst reviews every flag, and the site's security team decides the response. GHOST informs. People decide.

An alert is not a decision.

A useful test begins with the material, location and uncertainty the decision requires. The protocol must distinguish a supported assessment from an unresolved response.

Change is the signal.

Monitoring applications require a stable baseline and evidence that observed changes can be separated from environmental and measurement variation.

R/02 · Early stage research program

Airspace

Research into the assessment of non-transmitting objects and their material characteristics. No validated performance record or operational capability is claimed.

R/03 · Early stage research program

Applied research

Laboratory investigation of additional material classes and measurement applications. No clinical or diagnostic use, and no validated application performance is claimed.

/ Start with a blind test

We prove it on your site, under your rules.

Security work follows the same rule as our oil record. Results are locked before the answer is known, and you score them.

You place or record known targets on site, such as a void, a buried object or a test tunnel.
We survey without being told where they are.
We lock our results before you share the answer key.
You score the results. Deployment is discussed only after that.

A two-person crew, two cases and a tripod, one standard vehicle. No digging, and no disruption to operations.

These programs are in development. Contact info@truelevel.com to discuss technical collaboration or a defined evaluation.

/ Team

The people on the record.

truelevel brings together expertise in sensing, geoscience, exploration operations, hardware and finance. AI supports structured analysis and review. Named leaders remain responsible for technical approval and commercial decisions.

truelevel field crew taking readings across open savanna — truelevel field team · East Africa

Ahmed Alkhatib

Founder and Chief Executive Officer

Silicon Valley technologist turned repeat founder, with more than two decades building companies across technology, commerce and now subsurface exploration. Began his career in early stage Bay Area startups before working at Amazon, PayPal and eBay.

Founded MarkaVIP in 2010, which became the largest ecommerce platform in the Middle East and North Africa, raising over 100 million dollars and scaling past 1,000 employees before its acquisition in 2016. Founded truelevel in 2021 and has funded it personally through five years of stealth operation.

Dr. Zaid Khrais

Chief Scientist

Inventor of Photo-Electric Resonance Vibrometry (PRV) and principal architect of the GHOST technology framework. Lead author of the GHOST scientific white paper and of truelevel's field validation studies, including the blind depth concordance case studies and the Belize carbonate reservoir assessments.

Developed the method behind truelevel's pooled blind record of 20 of 21 depth points within tolerance. Leads material reference characterization, interpretation methodology and the science program.

Holds final technical approval. No classification, interpretation or report leaves truelevel without his sign-off.

Moe Haris

Chief Financial Officer

Moe brings nearly three decades of senior finance and operating experience in the energy retail sector, including the expansion of a major West Coast fuel and convenience business.

His experience includes acquisitions, syndicated financing and the financial systems needed to support growth. At truelevel, he leads financial planning and capital discipline.

Stephen Schubarth

Chief Petrophysicist

Petroleum engineer with more than 40 years of global experience in reservoir characterization, hydraulic fracturing and completion design. Recognized expert witness and published technical authority with leadership roles in SPE.

Performed the independent petrophysical interpretation on truelevel's first case study before joining the company.

Bill Chemerinski

VP, Drilling and Completions

Forty-five years of exploration and production operations across more than twelve countries, from deepwater Gulf of Mexico and the Black Sea to Arctic frontier exploration on Sakhalin and unconventional completions in West Texas.

Turns a GHOST report into a decision on the rig: a drillable target, a revised casing design, a changed sequence, or a well not drilled.

Issa Alkhatib

Director of Business Development

Business development across the United States, the Middle East, East Africa and Latin America, focused on energy, infrastructure and emerging markets. Leads partner engagement with government authorities and national energy organizations, and builds the project economics behind licensing and partnership decisions.

Dr. Muhammad Ayaz

Principal RF and Antenna Engineer

RF and microwave engineer specializing in phased arrays, beamforming and high-frequency PCB design. PhD in Electrical Engineering (Antennas and Electromagnetics), COMSATS University Islamabad. Author of more than 28 international publications.

Leads RF and antenna design for the GHOST sensor and its mobile and airborne platforms, from simulation through anechoic-chamber testing.

Issam Kanaan

Hardware Engineering Lead

Electronics engineer who takes hardware from schematic to field-ready unit. Master's degree in Electronics and Mechatronics Engineering, France. Led R&D, manufacturing and assembly of photobiomodulation devices in France, and ran a 12-person team building augmented reality wearables.

Owns the build, wiring and bench testing of GHOST units. Works in English, French and Arabic.

/ Contact

Operating in deliberate stealth.

Our field systems and methods are trade secrets, so we share details selectively, with partners, regulators and qualified investors.

info@truelevel.com

Exploration programs · Technical evaluation · Project investment · Research collaboration

/ Request a briefing

Tell us who you are. We will be in touch.

Share your target material, project stage or area of interest. We will route your request to the appropriate technical or commercial lead.

Please keep your initial message non-confidential. We can arrange confidentiality terms before reviewing proprietary project information.

/ Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy.

Last updated November 9, 2026. This policy explains what information truelevel.com collects and how truelevel uses it.

What we collect

When you submit the briefing form, we receive your name, work email, organization, role and message, together with the date and time of the request and your IP address. We collect nothing else through the form.

We do not use analytics, advertising trackers or cookies. The site keeps one small setting in your browser's session storage so the opening animation plays only once per visit. It is deleted when you close the tab.

How we use it

We use form submissions only to review and respond to your inquiry, to arrange a briefing, and to protect the form from abuse. We do not sell or rent your information, and we do not use it for advertising.

Where it goes

Requests are emailed to info@truelevel.com and stored in a file on our web hosting account that is not publicly accessible. Our web host and email provider process this information on our behalf.

To display the site, your browser loads fonts from Google Fonts and one script from the jsDelivr network. Those services receive your IP address and standard browser information when they deliver these files, under their own privacy policies.

How long we keep it

We keep inquiries for as long as needed to respond and to manage any resulting relationship, and then delete them. You can ask us to delete your inquiry at any time.

Your choices

You can ask to see, correct or delete the information you sent us by emailing info@truelevel.com. Depending on where you live, you may have additional rights under local law, and we will honor them.

Contact

truelevel · 1390 McCarthy Blvd · Milpitas, CA 95035 · info@truelevel.com